CELTIC FANS LEFT FUMING AFTER KRIS BOYD REVEALS THE REASON WHY HE SAID RANGER IS A BIGGER CLUB THAN CELTIC
In Scottish football, there are opinions… and then there are statements that ignite chaos.
Kris Boyd’s latest comments firmly fall into the second category.
With Rangers still waiting to lift a major trophy since their 2021 title win, the former Ibrox striker has refused to back down from his stance — insisting that Rangers remain the bigger club than Celtic. The reaction has been swift, brutal, and entirely predictable.
Celtic fans are furious. Rangers fans are divided. And once again, the Old Firm rivalry has exploded beyond the pitch and into the headlines.

https://x.com/scotsunsport/status/2006417869102305434?s=46
Boyd may have insisted that his view is “not controversial”, but judging by the fallout, Scottish football disagrees.
Rangers Without Silverware Since 2021 — The Uncomfortable Reality
There is no escaping one key fact at the centre of this storm: Rangers have not won a trophy since 2021.
That season — Steven Gerrard’s unbeaten league title — was meant to signal a turning point. It stopped Celtic’s historic ten-in-a-row, restored pride at Ibrox, and suggested Rangers were ready to dominate again.
Instead, the years that followed have told a different story.
- Celtic reclaimed the league
- Domestic cups returned to Parkhead
- Rangers repeatedly fell short in decisive moments
Despite flashes of promise in Europe and strong league finishes, Rangers’ inability to consistently convert opportunity into silverware has become a growing source of frustration for supporters.
It is against this backdrop that Boyd’s comments landed — and why they felt like fuel poured on an already raging fire.
What Kris Boyd Said — And Why It Blew Up
Speaking in his role as a pundit, Boyd did not sugar-coat his assessment of the current situation.
He openly criticised Rangers’ performances in Old Firm matches, questioned the squad’s quality, and suggested that Celtic are currently miles ahead in terms of structure, confidence, and identity.
Yet the most explosive element was Boyd’s underlying claim: despite Celtic’s recent success, Rangers are still the bigger football club.
According to Boyd, this isn’t arrogance — it’s history.
He points to Rangers’ record number of league titles, their global fanbase, and their long-standing status as one of the most decorated clubs in world football. From his perspective, recent trophy droughts do not erase decades of dominance.
To Boyd, that argument is straightforward.
To Celtic fans, it is completely unacceptable.
Celtic Fans React — “Living in the Past”
Social media erupted within minutes of Boyd’s remarks being circulated.
Celtic supporters accused the pundit of:
- Clinging to history instead of reality
- Ignoring recent dominance
- Moving the goalposts whenever Rangers fall behind on the pitch
Many pointed out that football is judged by what happens now, not what happened generations ago. Others mocked the idea that a club without trophies for several seasons could still claim superiority over one that continues to collect them.
The phrase “living in the past” appeared repeatedly across fan forums, comment sections, and timelines.
For Celtic fans, Boyd’s stance felt like a refusal to accept the current balance of power — and worse, an attempt to downplay their club’s success.
Why This Debate Never Dies
The “bigger club” argument is not new — but it never loses heat.
Rangers supporters traditionally lean on:
- Total trophy count
- Historical dominance
- Worldwide recognition
Celtic fans counter with:
- Recent domestic control
- Consistency under modern football structures
- Sustained success across competitions
The truth is uncomfortable for both sides: each argument depends on where you choose to start counting.
Boyd’s comments reopened this debate at a moment when emotions are already raw — particularly after Old Firm defeats and missed opportunities.
And in Scottish football, timing is everything.
Even Rangers Fans Are Split
While Celtic supporters were united in outrage, Rangers fans themselves were far from unanimous.
Some applauded Boyd’s honesty, arguing that criticism is necessary if the club is ever going to move forward. They saw his comments as a challenge — a reminder of what Rangers should be striving to be.
Others, however, felt Boyd’s words only highlighted uncomfortable truths:
- Rangers are chasing Celtic, not leading
- History cannot win matches
- Big-club status must be backed up with trophies
For a section of the Ibrox support, Boyd’s confidence felt misplaced at a time when results continue to fall short of expectations.
The Real Issue: Present vs Past
At the heart of this controversy lies a deeper question about modern football:
How much does history really matter anymore?
In today’s game, success is measured season by season. Fans demand progress, trophies, and European nights — not reminders of what their club used to be.
Celtic’s recent run of silverware has given their supporters confidence and momentum. Rangers’ inability to consistently match that success has created pressure, impatience, and scrutiny.
Boyd’s argument — whether intentional or not — exposed that contrast.
And that is why it hurt.
Punditry, Provocation, and Headlines
There is also a wider truth worth acknowledging: bold opinions drive attention.
Kris Boyd knows the Old Firm landscape better than most. He understands that strong statements generate reaction, clicks, and debate. In the age of football media, neutrality rarely trends.
By saying “this is not controversial”, Boyd ensured that it would become exactly that.
And once again, the Old Firm rivalry proved why it remains one of the most intense in world football — capable of turning a single comment into a national talking point.
Where Does This Leave Rangers and Celtic?
For Celtic, the response is simple: keep winning.
As long as trophies continue to arrive at Parkhead, arguments about size will feel academic.
For Rangers, the challenge is clearer — and harder:
- Close the gap
- Deliver silverware
- Turn criticism into motivation
Until that happens, voices like Boyd’s will continue to divide opinion — and invite ridicule from rivals.
Final Word
Kris Boyd may insist his comments are not controversial, but in Scottish football, context matters.
A trophy drought, a dominant rival, and the most bitter rivalry in the country created the perfect storm. His remarks didn’t just reopen an old debate — they reminded everyone how fragile pride can be when results don’t match reputation.
One thing is certain:
As long as Rangers and Celtic exist, arguments about who is “bigger” will never truly end.



Post Comment