There has been a lot of talk lately about Conor Gallagher potentially joining Tottenham
The Chelsea midfielder has been heavily linked with a move to Spurs recently, with the deal likely to be completed by the summer
Indeed, Tottenham’s interest is not new, with them reportedly making a bid for Gallagher on deadline day
Spurs has been postponed to late summer, but Ben Jacobs shared what he knows about this planned move on the Spurs chat podcast
According to Jacobs, Gallagher would have been happy to move to Tottenham in the summer if Spurs had put pressure on him
His contract was more difficult to complete, but unfortunately it didn’t work out
Gallagher was supposed to join in the summer and Jacobs shared what he knows about the £45 million man
“No, not at all
I also understand that if Spurs had been more aggressive, Gallaguer would have moved on last summer, because at that point he was not captain
He felt there was a situation
” So Chelsea told him that if they made this offer, they would recommend he leave,” Jacobs said
“At the moment it’s all about business and finance at Chelsea, so I don’t think anyone who comes in will have a chance
” If Chelsea’s numbers are achieved, it will be a very good number for Chelsea, so they will He will have no choice but to accept and then it will be up to Gallagher to decide whether to prevent the situation, but his position may change if he is honest with Chelsea’s owners
” missed chances his Spurs may have wasted a shot to get Gallagher here
The midfielder is currently one of Chelsea’s most important players and the club could be open to a sale, but reports suggest Gallagher wants to remain at Stamford Bridge and fight for his future
It seems there is
Of course, there’s a reason why Spurs didn’t push this deal hard in the summer
After spending too much money over the summer, money was tight and I was running out of time, but in hindsight, you can argue that was a mistake
It remains to be seen whether the Spurs will be able to revive Gallagher’s contract and reignite interest in him
Leave a Reply