Tottenham Hotspur’s 2-2 draw against Norwegian side Bodø/Glimt on Thursday night left fans with a bitter taste, not because of the result alone, but because of the performance of one man: The Austrian defender has come under immense fire from Spurs supporters across social media, who have now branded him the “worst player in the squad” after what many described as a calamitous display in Norway.
The game itself was supposed to be a straightforward affair. Tottenham, packed with international talent, were expected to dominate Bodø/Glimt, a side with considerably fewer resources and less European pedigree. Instead, Spurs had to claw their way back from behind and ultimately relied on a late own goal to avoid outright defeat.
But amid the disappointment of the result, one clear narrative has emerged from the fanbase: Danso’s performance was unacceptable, and many supporters are demanding he be shipped out of the club as soon as possible.
The Match Breakdown
The game kicked off with Spurs looking in control during the early stages. They had the bulk of possession, created half-chances, and appeared to be dictating the tempo. However, cracks began to show after the restart.
Bodø/Glimt grew in confidence and punished Spurs’ lack of defensive organization. Jens Petter Hauge struck in the 53rd minute to give the hosts the lead, and once again in the 66th minute to double their advantage. Both goals highlighted glaring issues in Tottenham’s defensive setup, and Danso was at the heart of the criticism.
Only minutes later, Micky van de Ven pulled one back for Spurs in the 68th minute, offering hope of a comeback. Tottenham pressed harder, but their play was scrappy and lacked composure. Eventually, in the 89th minute, fortune smiled on the London club when Gundersen put the ball into his own net to make it 2-2.
The result saved Spurs from outright embarrassment, but for many fans, it did little to mask what they saw as a humiliating performance — particularly from Danso.
Kevin Danso’s Performance Under the Microscope
Football can be cruel, and defenders are often remembered more for their mistakes than their solid interventions. That was the case for Danso against Bodø/Glimt.
From the first whistle, he appeared jittery. His positioning was poor, his decision-making questionable, and his distribution from the back repeatedly put Tottenham under unnecessary pressure. On several occasions, he either gave the ball away cheaply or was caught out of position, forcing teammates to scramble and cover.
For Bodø/Glimt’s opening goal, Danso was accused of being too passive, allowing Hauge far too much space to cut inside and finish clinically. For the second, the Austrian’s attempted clearance was described as “Sunday league” level, gifting possession back to the opposition in a dangerous area. Moments later, the ball was in the back of the net again.
What frustrated fans the most wasn’t just the mistakes, but the apparent lack of composure and awareness at crucial moments. Social media erupted within minutes of the final whistle, with Danso trending among Spurs supporters for all the wrong reasons.
Fan Reactions: “Enough is Enough”
Spurs fans are not known for holding back their opinions, and Danso was the lightning rod for criticism after the game. Phrases like “worst player in the squad,” “liability,” and “get him out of the club” were plastered across X (formerly Twitter), Reddit, and fan forums.
One supporter wrote:
“I’ve seen enough of Danso. He is finished here. Absolutely no composure, no awareness, nothing. He’s a walking disaster.”
Another added:
“Every time he’s on the pitch, we look like conceding. How is he still starting games for us? Send him back to the Bundesliga, ASAP.”
Some even compared his signing to Tottenham’s previous defensive transfer flops, branding him as yet another poor decision from the recruitment department.
The sheer volume of negative feedback illustrates just how little faith fans now have in Danso’s ability to be part of Spurs’ long-term plans.
Wider Problems in Tottenham’s Defense
While Danso has become the scapegoat for this particular match, some analysts point out that the entire defensive setup deserves scrutiny. Spurs conceded twice in 13 minutes, and both goals stemmed from collective lapses in concentration.
Micky van de Ven, Cristian Romero, and even goalkeeper Guglielmo Vicario all had shaky moments. But what set Danso apart was the consistency of his errors and his failure to recover from them. Where other players made mistakes but redeemed themselves with strong interventions later, Danso only compounded his poor start with further misjudgments.
This raises the question: Is Tottenham’s problem more about individual players, or is it a structural issue in how the defense is set up? Critics of Thomas Frank’s tactical approach (Tottenham’s current manager) suggest that the system leaves defenders too exposed. Still, most fans point the finger directly at Danso.
The Pressure Mounts on Danso
For Danso, the fallout from this match will be difficult to escape. Football fans have long memories, and once a player is branded a liability, it can take months — even years — of consistent performances to rebuild trust.
Already, calls are growing for Tottenham to drop him from the starting lineup. With fixtures piling up and the competition for places intensifying, Danso risks being frozen out if he cannot quickly turn things around.
The January transfer window could be decisive. Some fans are openly demanding the club cut their losses and move him on, even if it means taking a financial hit. Others argue he should at least be relegated to a backup role, only featuring in less significant fixtures.
Either way, the pressure is now immense, and every future performance will be scrutinized through the lens of this disaster against Bodø/Glimt.
What This Means for Tottenham
For Tottenham as a whole, the 2-2 draw is a wake-up call. A club with ambitions of competing at the highest level cannot afford to drop points in matches they are expected to win comfortably. The draw in Norway not only dents morale but also raises questions about squad depth and quality.
Fans are already restless, demanding that the board invest in more reliable defenders. The Danso debacle has become symbolic of a wider frustration: that Spurs are once again undermining their own progress with poor recruitment and questionable tactical choices.
If changes are not made, Tottenham risk repeating the same cycle of near-success followed by disappointment.
Conclusion
The Bodø/Glimt vs Tottenham 2-2 draw will not be remembered for Spurs’ fightback or even for the dramatic late own goal that salvaged a point. Instead, it will be remembered as the night Kevin Danso lost the trust of the fans.
Whether fairly or unfairly, the Austrian has become the focal point of Tottenham supporters’ anger. His mistakes were costly, his performance unconvincing, and his future at the club now hangs in the balance.
For Danso, the road back will be difficult. He will need to show resilience, improved performances, and a stronger mentality if he wants to win back even a fraction of the supporters’ trust. For Tottenham, the game serves as a reminder that their defensive frailties remain unsolved, and that one bad signing can ignite a storm of frustration among the fanbase.
As things stand, though, the verdict from fans is brutal and unforgiving: Danso has to go.
