Celtic Fans Call Out Commentator Over Controversial Remarks on Maeda’s Disallowed Goal
Football controversy continues to dominate discussions following the dramatic Scottish Premiership clash between Hibernian and Celtic. In addition to the ongoing debate surrounding key officiating decisions, Celtic fans are now calling out a commentator for remarks made about Daizen Maeda’s last-minute disallowed goal. Supporters are demanding accountability, arguing that biased commentary played a role in shaping public perception of the incident.
Hibernian’s Strong Start and the Offside Controversy
Hibernian entered the match with confidence and quickly set the tone with an aggressive attacking approach. Their momentum paid off when Josh Campbell opened the scoring, giving Hibs a crucial lead. However, it was Campbell’s second goal that became the main talking point of the game.
Initially, the goal stood, and celebrations erupted at Easter Road. However, Celtic fans and players immediately protested, claiming that Campbell was in an offside position before converting the chance. The match officials reviewed the footage, but without conclusive evidence to overturn the on-field decision, the goal was allowed to stand.
As the match progressed, new footage emerged showing an alternate angle of the controversial play. This fresh perspective appeared to confirm that Campbell was, in fact, offside when the ball was played through to him. Fans took to social media in disbelief, with many questioning how such a critical call had been missed. The footage quickly went viral, amplifying discussions on whether the officials had made a grave error that altered the course of the game.
Hibernian Calls for Maeda’s Goal to Be Disallowed**
While the controversy over Campbell’s goal was still raging, another incident drew heated reactions. Celtic’s Daizen Maeda pulled one back for his team in the 70th minute, making it 2-1. However, Hibernian officials and supporters immediately protested, claiming that Maeda had made illegal contact with the goalkeeper before scoring.
Hibernian argued that Maeda’s challenge on the goalkeeper should have led to the goal being disallowed. The club has since urged the Scottish FA to review the incident, suggesting that the failure to cancel the goal raises serious concerns over refereeing standards. This development has further fueled debates over officiating consistency in Scottish football.
### **Maeda’s Last-Minute Disallowed Goal Sparks Outrage**
As if the controversy wasn’t already at its peak, the most dramatic moment came in the dying seconds of the match when Maeda appeared to score a late equalizer, only for the referee to rule it out. The decision left Celtic fans outraged, but what fueled their anger even more was the commentary accompanying the moment.
Many Celtic supporters believe that the commentator covering the match displayed clear bias in describing the disallowed goal, allegedly downplaying the controversy and justifying the referee’s decision in a way that seemed unfair. Fans have since taken to social media, criticizing the commentator’s remarks and calling for an official response from the broadcasting network.
Some have gone as far as to demand an apology or a formal review of the commentator’s conduct, arguing that such moments shape how incidents are perceived and unfairly influence narratives around controversial refereeing decisions.
### **Fans Yet to Take Action**
Although there is widespread frustration, Celtic fans have not yet taken formal action. However, discussions are intensifying within online fan communities, with many considering submitting complaints to both the broadcaster and football authorities. Others have called for increased scrutiny of media coverage in Scottish football, insisting that commentary should remain neutral and free from bias.
### **Scottish FA Under Pressure to Investigate**
The Scottish FA is now being tipped to launch an official investigation into the refereeing decisions made during the match. Calls for better consistency in officiating have been growing, with many urging the governing body to take action to prevent similar controversies in the future.
If the investigation goes ahead, it could set a precedent for future matches and influence how refereeing decisions are reviewed in Scottish football. For now, both Hibernian and Celtic will need to move forward, but the controversy surrounding this match is unlikely to fade anytime soon.
One thing is certain—this game will be remembered not just for the goals, but for the incidents that left the football world in disbelief.
Leave a Reply