In the aftermath of Rangers’ 3-3 draw against Celtic in the Scottish League Cup final on December 15, 2024, which culminated in a penalty shootout victory for Celtic, Rangers manager Philippe Clement launched a vehement critique of the officiating, particularly focusing on a pivotal incident involving the Video Assistant Referee (VAR) system.
The controversy centers on an extra-time episode where Rangers’ forward Vaclav Cerny was brought down by Celtic defender Liam Scales. Referee John Beaton awarded a free-kick at the edge of the penalty area, a decision that Clement ardently disputed, asserting that the foul occurred within the penalty box and warranted a penalty kick. Clement expressed bewilderment over VAR’s inaction, stating, “He [the referee] didn’t get the communication from the VAR to come to watch the screen, which for me is a really weird situation.”
Clement’s frustration was compounded by the influx of messages he received, indicating widespread agreement that a penalty should have been awarded. He remarked, “My phone is overloaded with the penalty situation with Cerny. I get hundreds of messages now about that.”
This incident is not isolated; it follows a series of contentious refereeing decisions that have adversely affected Rangers in recent matches. In a prior encounter against Hibernian, a penalty was awarded against Rangers’ Ianis Hagi after a clash with Josh Campbell, a decision upheld by the Scottish Football Association’s Key Match Incidents Panel despite Clement’s objections.
The cumulative effect of these decisions has intensified scrutiny on the consistency and reliability of VAR and officiating standards in Scottish football. Clement’s outspoken criticism underscores a growing concern within the sport regarding the efficacy of technological interventions intended to support fair play.
In light of these events, there is a burgeoning call among football stakeholders for a comprehensive review of VAR protocols and referee training to enhance decision-making accuracy and restore confidence in the officiating process.
Philippe Clement’s Furious VAR Rant After Controversial Draw with Celtic
Philippe Clement, the Rangers manager, delivered an impassioned post-match rant following his team’s League Cup final loss to Celtic. Clement expressed deep frustrations over what he claimed were glaring refereeing failures that turned the tide of the match in Celtic’s favor, zeroing in on the lack of intervention by the Video Assistant Referee (VAR) during a critical incident in extra time. His remarks have sparked fresh debates about the reliability and impartiality of VAR decisions in Scottish football, putting pressure on officials and the Scottish Football Association (SFA).
The Controversial Incident
With the match tied deep into extra time, Rangers forward Vaclav Cerny was felled by Celtic’s Liam Scales near the edge of the penalty area. Referee John Beaton awarded a free-kick instead of a penalty. Clement and the Rangers bench were incensed, believing the foul clearly took place inside the box. VAR, which was expected to review the decision and suggest a pitch-side monitor check, remained silent, a decision that Clement found both baffling and infuriating.
“Everyone could see it. The referee didn’t go to the screen. Why do we even have VAR if it’s not used properly?” Clement fumed. “This isn’t just a small mistake—this is the difference between winning a trophy and losing one.”
Public Outcry and Support for Clement
Clement noted that his phone was “overloaded with messages” from fans and football figures alike, many of whom supported his stance that Rangers were unfairly denied a penalty. He emphasized the importance of accountability in officiating, calling the lack of a review “a disgrace” and questioning whether there are deeper biases at play.
“I have been respectful toward referees, but when decisions keep going against us, it makes you wonder about fairness in the system. We need better communication and transparency from VAR, or the integrity of the league is in question,” he added.
A Pattern of Controversial Decisions
This match was the latest in a series of games where Rangers have felt wronged by refereeing decisions. In a recent Scottish Premiership clash with Hibernian, a contentious penalty was awarded against Rangers after minimal contact between Ianis Hagi and Josh Campbell. Despite Clement’s protests, the SFA’s Key Match Incidents Panel upheld the call. These incidents, according to Clement, have damaged trust in the officiating process.
“The pattern is clear. There’s a lack of consistency. I’m not asking for special treatment, just fair treatment,” Clement said. “These aren’t isolated errors; they are decisive moments that influence the outcome of important games.”
Pressure on Officials and the SFA
Clement’s explosive comments have reignited calls for a thorough overhaul of VAR protocols and referee standards. Pundits and former players have weighed in, with some echoing Clement’s concerns about referee performance in high-stakes matches. Others have called for additional training and stricter guidelines to ensure VAR is used effectively.
Kris Boyd, a former Rangers player turned pundit, warned that fan discontent could escalate if the SFA fails to address the growing controversy. “The anger is real, and the fans deserve answers. If the system is broken, it must be fixed,” Boyd stated.
What’s Next?
The SFA is expected to review the match footage and referee performance, though it remains unclear whether any formal action will be taken. Meanwhile, Clement’s willingness to publicly challenge officials may place additional pressure on league administrators to clarify VAR procedures and improve consistency across matches.
With tensions high and Rangers supporters feeling aggrieved, the spotlight will remain firmly on VAR’s role in Scottish football. For now, Clement’s words have ensured that the debate over fair play and officiating bias will continue to dominate headlines.
Leave a Reply